🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."